Where Was Jesus Born in Biblical Archaeology
Christmas season event draws near each year, the Nativity story Where was Jesus born is revisited in churches and households around the world. Jesus was born? In the Bible, the answer seems straightforward: Bethlehem. Both Matthew 2 and Luke 2 state that Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea.
The existence of Nazareth
The town of Bethlehem in the West Bank, some six miles south of Jerusalem. According to the New Testament account of the apostle Matthew, Joseph and Mary were living in Bethlehem.
In the southern region of Judea at the time of Jesus’ birth and later moved to Nazareth in the northern Galilee region. In the more popular account of the apostle Luke, Joseph and a very pregnant.
Mary traveled more than 90 miles from their residence in Nazareth.
Regardless of the variation, both apostles agree that Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea,
The city where King David had been born a thousand years earlier. A requirement for followers of the Judeo-Christian tradition.
While Bethlehem in Judea was known in the Hebrew Bible where Jesus was born and New Testament as being the birthplace of King David and the birthplace of the future messiah, the small village of Nazareth in Galilee was much lesser-known, not even warranting a mention in the Hebrew Bible, the Talmud or in the writings of Josephus. King explains, “Nazareth derives its importance entirely from its relationship to the life and teaching of Jesus.”
Where Was Jesus Born:- Jesus’s birth in a stable
The Church of the Nativity is a popular pilgrimage spot during the Christmas season. Built over a cave in 326 AD, many believe it marks the site where Christ was actually born in a stable. Nowhere in the Gospel, however, is it said that Jesus was born in a stable or a barn.
Luke only says that he was placed in a manger and that there was no room in the inn. When people hear manger, they immediately think of a barn. But many houses of the time were equipped with mangers inside of the house. Permanent stone mangers have been found by archaeologists inside of 1st-century dwellings for the purpose of feeding animals that were meant for sacrifice.
The contrast between Bethlehem, the birthplace of King David, and Nazareth, a small agricultural village, is obvious. Yet both sites were significant in the life of Jesus.
It is impossible to say that the archaeology confirms when Jesus was born there. But there’s lots of evidence in its favor. According to the Bible, Mary and Joseph either came to Bethlehem for a census, or they already lived there. It’s difficult to say which of these, or either, is true.
Pilgrims visiting Bethlehem within about 100 years of Christ’s birth already believed Jesus was born there. We also have these very specific descriptions of what the town was like at the time.
When pilgrims visited later, after Rome had become Christian, people did describe a manger. But it sounds more likely to have been a trough than a manger. This was on display at one point, and it fits the picture of a town where the water supply is the most important thing.
For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world. But that the world might be saved through him. Whoever in this event believes in him will not be condemned, But whoever does not believe has already been condemned.
because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. (John 3:17-18)